by Guest » 14th July 2010, 00:26
If we can only keep the objective in mind, we can achieve a lot. Efforts such as the one we may be conceiving often lose direction after some successes are scored and things begin to get exciting. We must have clear focus and allow anything else to be addressed by other vehicles (which we, as individuals, can still be part of).
I see our overall objective as being something like:
"To ensure that issues arising from financial service delivery are adequately and speedily addressed". (Someone can help improve on the English in the above sentence.)
This objective will have various aspects to it, including:
1. Getting the issues to the right offices
(this may be an office in the "offending institution" or other offices that has the ability to address the issue. Thanks to those that have forwarded the complaints. I actually did the same last week. I was assured something would be done and a response could be put on dearzambia)
2. Obtaining (from the relevant office) speedy feedback and committment to addressing the issue
( i.e acknowledgement of reciept of complaint, indication of action to be taken and timeframes required, agreement on expected result of such action, etc)
3. Respective offices to incorporate at least some of the suggestions/thoughts/proposed solutions (and possibly the complainants) into the process intended to address the complaint
(ideally, the complainant should be involved in addressing the problem. It is rather unhelpful to focus on the problem without offering solutions and participating in implementation. Participation may actually help the complainant appreciate some of the operating realities behind the issue)
4. Disserminating successful results and recorgnition of offices that have responded well towards addressing complaints
(e.g such as the Rhapsody's & its MD. Such need to be profiled so that they are encouraged by the positive publicity & and the resultant growth in business)
There should be other aspects that can fall under the objective. We can probably add a few, but we may not want to have so many that we fail to work with them. So, any more aspects?
The initiative can get off the ground even before we decide on the appropriate organisational vehicle it can ride in. It can initially simply be a project driven by concerned users of particular services. Most important is to keep in mind the purpose of the initiative. The vehicle it rides in may become clearer with a bit of time.
As mentioned by Jade and Makaveli, a mechanism of forwarding complaints, getting feedback (preferably posted on dearzambia) and recorgnising effort needs to get started. I propose that a small team be picked to co-ordinate this. It may be too much for one person. I propose Jade & Makaveli. Any seconder?
A name for the initiative would be a good idea. Any suggestions?
Agreement on some kind of "code of ethics" may also be important so that we can stay within an agreed framework (e.g types of issues, language to be used, etc).
I hope this is helpful.
Let's keep talking . . .